Wednesday, October 24, 2012


Worse Than Watergate

Turns out the White House & the State Department had evidence the attack on the Benghazi consulate was a planned terrorist strike WHILE IT WAS STILL UNDERWAY: 

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/24/us-usa-benghazi-emails-idUSBRE89N02C20121024

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_162-57538689/emails-detail-unfolding-benghazi-attack-on-sept-11/?tag=AverageMixRelated
These new revelations led to an epic Twitter rant this morning about how this administration will go down in infamy.  

[Yeah, it's Twitter. Start at the bottom, read your way up!]


UPDATE:  Been nothing short of hilarious since the 2nd Presidential debate to watch Liberals shift their ground as quickly as they can to fit whatever new story the administration is telling.  

1. It was all about the video!  It wasn't a planned attack! 
2. He said it was a planned terrorist attack on day 1! Get it right, wingnutz!
3. Of course the administration went on for 2 weeks to sell 'it was all over a video' like a mofo to the American public! There was no evidence it was a terror attack!
4.  How many times do we have to tell you the administration has always said it was a terrorist attack!
5.  It was all about the video!

Yet what do they keep saying to the other side?  "Quit changing your story, stick to the facts!"  Yes, you could not ask for a better case of projection that this.  They are having to shift what they are saying almost on a daily basis but it's the OTHER SIDE that's doing it, not them.  

Going to be interesting to see just how many times the White House can change it's story and they play along before they finally have the "WTF??!!" moment and snap out of it.

11 comments:

  1. ODS - Obama Derangement Syndrome.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Again you display your amazing ability to live in your own alternate reality.

      Delete
    2. Do you have any concept of irony?

      Didn't think so. Get some rest.

      Delete
    3. Do you have any concept of what happens to a sitting President who engages in a cover up of a terrorist attack that killed 4 Americans?

      Didn't think so.

      Rest won't help you a bit.

      Delete
    4. You sound like you're running on coffee and rage.

      Maybe "Coffee and Rage" could be the new name for your echo chamber blog. It would make way more sense.

      Good luck!

      Delete
    5. Your projection is noted. This happens a lot with Liberals.

      Seek professional help now. ;)

      I'm having a blast watching this administration implode. You're projecting something that isn't there.

      Delete
    6. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a Liberal. I know that must blow your ironclad binary system - but then again, thinking clearly doesn't seem to be your strong suit.

      Oh well. Your demented rants are kind of fun anyway.

      Delete
  2. Congress must return early. Should start Impeachment hearings right away. We must all contact our US Reps and Senators; FLOOD their offices locally and DC. Especially before This wicked man gets a chance to sign the UN treaty forcing Americans to give up guns, which he openly plans to do, along with other U.N. measures/treatises that strip our USA Constitutional rights. Texas, where I am, already booted out "U.N. Monitors" that this traitorous "President" is trying to bring in to our FREE ELECTIONS to every polling place in the USA on Election Day. VOTE EARLY.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Miriam, Obama can sign anything he wants to, it won't matter. The U.S. Senate must ratify that treaty by a 2/3 majority. That ain't gonna happen. There are several Democrat Senators from states that the population overwhelmingly support the second amendment. Those Dems will not vote for cloture of a Republican filibuster on such a treaty, nor would they vote for such a treaty in the absence of a filibuster. And, assuming that the treaty was ratified, those blue beanies make excellent targets for the 10s of millions of gun owners in this country, and anyone running as a Democrat will also be a target. Remember, also, that the military's oaths are not to the UN or to the President, but to the Consitution, to defend it against all enemies, foreign and domestic. A president that would sign such a treaty, and a Senate that would ratify it, would automatically make themselves domestic enemies of the Constitution.

      Delete
    2. Targets? Wow.

      Delete