It was a long time ago! You don't NEED to hear from 

eyewitnesses of this terrorist attack! Can we just all move on already?

IN OTHER NEWS, THE BENGHAZI COVER-UP CONTINUES TO UNRAVEL

The administration's attempts to stonewall on Benghazi also reached comical proportions today.  For over 6 months we were told 'the investigation is ongoing, can't talk about it'.  Now all of a sudden, watch Jay Carney suddenly pull the 'Benghazi was a long time ago, let's move on, OK?' card: 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_w2McO3Wk70

Oct: Wait for the investigation.Dec: Wait for the investigation.Mar: Wait for the investigation.May: #Benghazi happened a long time ago.
— Razor (@hale_razor) May 1, 2013

Gee, what could possibly have happened to cause the switch from "Sorry can't talk about it" to "This was a long time ago, why are we still talking about it?" 

Oh. Hey. Maybe the fact actual EYEWITNESSES in Benghazi that night have finally decided to come forward despite threats & give their testimony to Congress: 

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57582207/benghazi-whistleblowers-still-waiting-to-tell-their-story/

Eventually, some of these people were going to talk.  The only question was, how long could this thuggish administration cow them into anonymous silence?  Turns out the answer was about seven months.  

If the Bush administration had tried to keep eyewitnesses of a terrorist attack on the anniversary of 9/11 that killed Americans from telling their stories, do you need ME to tell you how our DNC shill mainstream media would be covering it? 

Andrew Breitbart & Lee Stranahan

Vindicated On Pigford Scandal

The New York Times 'revealed' to it's readers a few days ago what everyone who followed Andrew Breitbart and Lee Stranhan's expose of Pigford knew over 3 years ago: 

After starting out for a legitimate purpose to rectify real grievances, the Pigford program was turned by Democrats into a huge vote-buying scam using taxpayer money right out of the Treasury. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/26/us/farm-loan-bias-claims-often-unsupported-cost-us-millions.html?hp&_r=1&pagewanted=all&

For exposing the corruption and lies of Pigford, and how it has devolved into a huge cash cow for Democrats fronting bogus discrimination complaints in order to steal taxpayer's money, Andrew Breitbart and Lee Stranahan were mercilessly lampooned, mocked, ridiculed and attacked by the Left for over 3 long years.  

But that didn't stop them from telling the truth about Pigford and how it was dishonestly being used to defraud American taxpayers out of hundreds of millions of dollars: 

Eric Bohelert made countering every single revelation about Pigford by Breitbart & Stranahan with mockery and ridicule his own personal quest from his post at Media Matters For America: 

http://twitchy.com/2013/04/26/hilarious-flashback-media-matters-tool-told-breitbart-to-hold-a-mardi-gras-style-funeral-for-pigford-crusade/

Great idea for @andrewbreitbart: He should have a mock, Mardi Gras-style funeral this wk for his Pigford crusade. Cuz it's dead/buried
— Eric Boehlert (@EricBoehlert) March 7, 2011

Since the NYT's broke this front page expose of the huge extent of Pigford corruption on April 25th, Boehlert hasn't tweeted or posted one word about it.  Anyone care to guess why? 

To me, this was the biggest revelation of the entire NYT's story: 

Er, what?! You mean Attorney General Eric Holder has had for 5 years 'broad discretion' to settle Pigford cases all by his lonesome without any messy Congressional or Court oversight and we're only just NOW finding out about it?  

Here's intrepid Attorney General Eric Holder trying to decide

how much Treasury money to hand out to some guy who never

owned a farm but who WILL be very generous with future 

Democratic votes and donations. 

So how many MILLIONS of the taxpayers money has he directly funneled out of the Treasury in the past 5 years?  And who got all this money? Was anybody keeping count? Does any one know? 

Congress needs to look into this just as soon as it's done with it's Benghazi and Boston Marathon bombing investigations.  

The Obama Administration's Determination To Avoid 

The Obvious Is Reaching 

Insane Proportions - 

And It's Already Costing
American's Their Lives

It was always ludicrous that this administration embarked on a policy in 2009 of DEFINING Islamic terrorism out of existence by using solipsistic phrases like 'man-caused disasters', 'workplace violence', 'overseas contingencies operations' and whatever else they could dream up.  

So the policy the past 5 years has been to drone-strike the sh*t out of Al Qaeda and other terrorist organizations overseas while at the same time not allowing even the USE of the words 'jihad' or 'Islamic terrorism' in official language in gov't use on the domestic front.  

It's not just insanely arrogant, it was also incredibly stupid, as the administration is once again being forced to use it's patented dodge that the Tsarnaev brothers are only 'lone wolf domestic terrorists'.  

How many times has the Obama administration made this claim insanely early in the investigation?  

Shoe Bomber = Lone wolf
NYT's Square Car bomber = Lone wolf
Ft. Hood shooter = Lone wolf
Underwear Bomber = Lone wolf

and now: 

Boston Marathon bombers: a pair of lone wolves. 

Now, there is an ELEMENT of truth to the lone wolf idea.  Al Qaeda has clearly switched strategies from sending operatives from foreign countries like Saudi Arabia to the United States to carry out a single, specific attack.  Like they did on 9-11. 

No, what they'll do now is FIND radicalized Muslim fanatics who ALREADY LIVE inside the target country and encourage them to act.  

But can a guy who traveled to a foreign country to meet radical Islamic terror groups and get training, encouragement and funding before returning to launch his own 'lone wolf' attack REALLY be a lone wolf? 

HOW DID THE GOV'T MISS ALL THE RED FLAGS? 

There is a story in the British press about the Saudis sending the Dept. of Homeland Security a warning in a letter in 2012 that mentioned Tamerlan Tsarnaev by NAME and that he was linked to a plot to launch an 'explosive attack a major US city'.  The Saudi official quoted anonymously in the report also claims the British Gov't got the same warning the Americans did.  

On the condition of anonymity, a DHS official confirmed to the Daily Mail that such a letter does indeed exist, and he had heard about it before the Daily Mail called and asked regarding it.  

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2317493/Saudi-Arabian-ambassador-Washington-DENIES-nation-warned-United-States-Tamerlan-Tsarnaev-2012.html

It must be remembered that when it was initially claimed that the FBI had interviewed Tamerlan Tsarnaev back in 2011, the FBI at first issued a flat and complete denial.  Only after family members were talking in the press about the interviews they had with the FBI did an abrupt about-face occur. 

"Oh. THAT Tamerlan Tsarnaev in Boston! Oh yeah, ok. We talked to this guy 2 years ago, didn't find anything." 

When the bombing happened on Monday, you would have supposed by the time the video and pictures of the suspected bombers were circulating all over the country on Thursday morning that SOMEBODY at the FBI or the DHS would have been poring over the list of people in the Boston area with radical Islamic ties. 

I mean, how long do you suppose the list is of people that live in Massachusetts with terrorist ties? How many make the list of 'a foreign gov't told us to watch this guy for terrorist activity' list?  If such a list is more than a couple hundred names long, I'd be shocked.  Was nobody looking at known or suspected Islamic radicals in the Boston area in that 4 day span from Monday to late Thursday night, when the terrorist brothers decided to ambush a cop? Would that police officer be alive right now if somebody at the FBI or DHS has been doing the COMMON SENSE THING and looking at known radicalized Muslims in Boston? 

As I ranted on Twitter the other day, from the earliest beginnings of this administration's roll out of it's 'smart power' policy of redefining the domestic terror threat out of existence, people were warning this would put the walls between federal agencies right back up and put us on a pre-9/11 footing again.  AND AMERICANS WOULD DIE BECAUSE OF IT. 

Dick & Liz Cheney were exactly right, as all the fumbling and bumbling by the FBI, CIA, DHS and White House the past 2 weeks has amply demonstrated.  

Click on image to read Twitter Rant at full size;

start at bottom of the right hand column and read  your way up.

The Kermit Gosnell Case

Gosnell initially scoffed at the idea he would ever be convicted of murder.

How 'Access To Choice' Ended Up Trumping Public Safety

Some observations after reading the Grand Jury report - which you can read yourself here: 

http://www.phila.gov/districtattorney/PDFs/GrandJuryWomensMedical.pdf


1.  As incredible as this is going to sound, PA Dept. of Health [DOH] officials decided to stop regular inspections of the state's abortion clinics in 1993; then in 1999 they held a big meeting where they discussed whether or not to begin regular inspections again...and decided not to since they strongly suspected several clinics would NOT pass any inspections.  Since closing clinics would 'harm women's access to abortion', it was decided to leave these unsanitary, unsafe clinics alone and allow them to continue to operate.

This. Actually. Happened.  It's on page 9 of the Grand Jury's official report.  

But at least the department had been doing something up to that point, however
ineffectual. After 1993, even that pro forma effort came to an end. Not because of
administrative ennui, although there had been plenty. Instead, the Pennsylvania
Department of Health abruptly decided, for political reasons, to stop inspecting abortion clinics at all. The politics in question were not anti-abortion, but pro. 

With the change of administration from Governor Casey to Governor Ridge, officials concluded that inspections would be “putting a barrier up to women” seeking abortions. Better to leave clinics to do as they pleased, even though, as Gosnell proved, that meant both women and babies would pay.

One of the DOH's own state lawyers - who was subsequently fired along with a lot of other people for this, by the way - testified to the grand jury about that 1999 meeting:  

http://www.businessinsider.com/kermit-gosnell-clinic-not-inspected-2013-4#ixzz2QGpovf4O

The grand jury report that lays out allegations against Gosnell has an entire section called "How did this go on so long?" The simple answer is politics. 

Pennsylvania's health department stopped routine inspections of abortion facilities in the state after Tom Ridge, a pro-choice Republican, became governor in 1995. 

Health department lawyers "changed their legal opinions and advice to suit the policy preferences of different governors," health department official Janet Staloski said in grand jury testimony. In this case, she said the state didn't want to be "putting a barrier up to women" who wanted abortions. 

In 1999, high-level Pennsylvania officials met to consider starting up regular inspections again but decided not to, state lawyer Kenneth Brody testified, according to the grand jury report. He told the grand jury that officials were concerns that abortion clinics wouldn't meet inspection standards and then there "would be less abortion facilities." 

The state's politics-driven policy continued until the gruesome allegations regarding Gosnell came to light.

"Choice" trumped public safety. Time and again, PA health & legal officials chose to look the other way and let a butcher stay in business.  Late term abortions have been illegal in America since 2003, and state law in PA forbid abortions being done after 6 months.  So the kind of abortions Gosnell was doing were illegal to begin with. 

2.  Even two women DYING from procedures performed by Gosnell was not enough to get PA officials to crack the door open and take a look into Gosnell's clinic.  This is a dereliction of duty beyond the pale.  

Karnamaya Mongar was killed by Gosnell in November, 2009

The only record of any inspections being done of Gosnell's clinic from 1993 until the FBI raid finally shuttered the clinic in 2010 is from a health worker looking into compliance with a child vaccine program. This health worker checking up on kids vaccines used everything but signal flags to tell her superiors things at Gosnell's clinics were not right.  She was ignored.  

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/04/14/PA-Dept-Health-Official-Tried-To-Help-Ignored-By-Superiors

It caused a huge state-wide scandal in PA when it was discovered that two women could actually die from an abortion "doctor's" bungling and it wouldn't even buy that abortion clinic a summary inspection.  

3.  Even after the second death in 2009, and numerous instances of women having to be rushed to emergency facilities after botched procedures at Gosnell's clinic, Gosnell was allowed to continue to operate.  It was an FBI raid investigating Gosnell's illegal prescription drug sales that finally exposed the horror of what was going on in his 'clinic'.  

Got that? Killing two women and maiming countless others since 1993 didn't even buy Kermit Gosnell an inspection, but rumors he was selling illegal prescription drugs got him raided by the FBI. 

Karnamaya Mongar died as a result of malpractice by Gosnell's clinic staff on November 19, 2009.  The FBI raid that finally ended the horror was held on February 18, 2010, a good 3 months after Mongar's death.  Gosnell was still in business, with the FBI finding, as the Grand Jury reports on page 20:  

......blood on the floor. A stench of urine filled the air. A flea-infested cat
was wandering through the facility, and there were cat feces on the stairs. Semi-conscious women scheduled for abortions were moaning in the waiting room or the recovery room, where they sat on dirty recliners covered with blood-stained blankets.

All the women had been sedated by unlicensed staff – long before Gosnell arrived
at the clinic – and staff members could not accurately state what medications or dosages they had administered to the waiting patients. Many of the medications in inventory were past their expiration dates.

3.  Kermit Gosnell did not 'fall through the cracks'.  

Gosnell was no 'back alley' abortionist. He was licensed by the State.

As the grand jury report makes clear, his abuses were brought to the attention of PA health officials repeatedly between 1993 and 2010.  And repeatedly, PA health officials made a decision to take no action.  When they stopped regular inspections in 1993 it was claimed the DOH would inspect clinics only when they received specific complaints.  Yet the fact the DOH received numerous complaints about Gosnell from 1993-2010 while taking no action demonstrates this 'policy' was bogus.  

4.  Gosnell's abortion 'procedure' wasn't really an abortion procedure.  

Unlike prostaglandin or D&C abortions, the two main late-term abortion techniques, Gonell's method ensured live births would take place.  What he was doing was he was sedating the women and then giving them labor-inducing drugs, forcing them to give premature birth.  

Inducing early labor in the 6th, 7th, and 8th month of gestation virtually assures some babies will exit the womb alive.  Gosnell's method for handling such cases was to take a pair of scissors and sever the baby's spinal cord at the neck.  

***WARNING****

GRAPHIC IMAGES BELOW.  IF SEEING TWO OF THE ACTUAL INFANT MURDER VICTIMS OF KERMIT GOSNELL WOULD UPSET YOU, SKIM DOWN QUICKLY TO PASS OVER THE EVIDENCE. 

These pictures are disturbing.  For good reason have plenty of people discussed how this case has deeply affected them.  You will have to click on them to bring them up to full size. 

The result of an 'evacuation of the uterine contents' after Gosnell 'terminated the pregnancy'. 

Gosnell is charged by the State of Penn. with murdering this baby boy.  

Below are images from a 'dilation and curettage abortion

The difference between what Gosnell was doing with inducing early delivery vs.

a real abortion method such as Dilation & Curettage should be fairly obvious. 

5.  While the mainstream media is belatedly covering the Gosnell case, they are insisting on referring to the victims as 'fetuses'.  

This is incorrect.  The State of PA has correctly put Gosnell on trial for murder of babies, not 'fetuses'.  These babies were born, they were outside of the womb, and they were alive when they were killed by having their spinal cords cut.  Even according to many pro-choicer's convoluted 'inside womb a fetus, outside the womb alive a baby' this is murder, and the State is treating it as such. 

In fact, this is the real reason why the MSM was deliberately trying to 'overlook' the 'nonstory' of Gosnell up until this week. 

How many more Gosnells are out there, operating with impunity thus far because they knew they didn't have to worry about surprise inspections by state health officials? Is anybody out there REALLY looking for the next Gosnell?  Or like the now-fired PA DOH officials, are they part of the cult of choice that practically results in policy that means 'access to choice' trumps public safety? 

UPDATE: One might have been exposed in Delaware already due to 5 women having to be rushed to local hospitals since January of this year: 

http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/local&id=9059172

Two former employees have come forward to blow the whistle to the local ABC affiliate.  They very much make it sound like Gosnell 2.0.  A key difference? This is a Planned Parenthood abortion clinic.

UPDATE II:  Kermit Gosnell - Maiming & Injuring Women Since 1972!  James Taranto in the WSJ had a long column on how we got from Roe to Gosnell that is well worth a read; 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324030704578422883948238160.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_MIDDLETopOpinion

This particular passage made for especially chilling reading: 

As a long-time pro-life advocate, I've known for years the only real effect Roe v. Wade had on back alley abortionists was to allow those quacks to move from the back alley to hang their shingle on Main St. and get a license from the State to do what they'd already been doing.  The idea that legalization of abortion drove the back alley butchers out of business is one of the most cherished illusions of the Progressive movement.    

UPDATE III:  After a week of testimony at the Gosnell trial about dead babies being dropped into toilets and flushed into Philadelphia's sewage system, this was sort of inevitable. 

Planned Parenthood & NARAL weigh in: 'By Golly, If There's Anything The Gosnell Case Proves, It's That Abortion Clinics In America Need FEWER Inspections And Less Oversight From The State.

Yes.  Really. They said this.  

http://weaselzippers.us/2013/04/22/planned-parenthood-naral-abortionist-monster-kermit-gosnell-proves-we-need-fewer-restrictions-on-abortion-clinics/

News of the Week: 

Eagle Ford Shale Oil Field

Adds 116,000 New Jobs

& $61 Billion To Texas 

Economy In 2012

http://www.aei-ideas.org/2013/03/the-eagle-ford-shale-oil-field-came-out-of-nowhere-and-had-an-61-economic-impact-on-texas-last-year/?utm_source=twitter&utm_medium=web&utm_campaign=032713

What's interesting is Eagle Ford was found just 6 years ago, and nobody knew at the time what a bonanza it was going to be.  It doubled it's oil output in just ONE YEAR from 2011 to 2012 and now clears 375,000 barrels a day.  

Eagle Ford in Texas, Bakken in North Dakota & Marcellus in Pennsylvania are leading the way in an energy revolution that is totally befuddling the Obama Administration. Take out the economic gains of states like Texas and North Dakota and the economic picture for the nation gets even bleaker.

But instead of following Texas' lead, right now Washington and the EPA are planning their counter attack.

Out Of The 100 Biggest Cities

In America, Only 14 Now Have

More Jobs Now Than Before 2007 Recession Hit

Not surprisingly, 6 of the only 14 major American cities that now have MORE jobs than they did than before the recession of 2007 are in Texas.  

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323361804578390823877463426.html

And let it be noted: Texas Gov. Rick Perry has fought Washington constantly - especially the out of control EPA - to bring about this success.  

NY Gov. Andrew Cuomo Unsuccessfully Tried To 

Hide A Scientific Report From The Public

New York and other states could be enjoying the same economic lift from oil and gas development if it weren't for politicians that still buy the whole Global Warming fraud. 

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/01/06/leaked-report-suppressed-by-cuomo-says-fracking-is-safe/

“Thanks to a leak from an anonymous insider, we learned Thursday that a report commissioned by the State of New York has given fracking a clean bill of health. The insider ‘did not think it should be kept secret’ and released the document, which is now nearly one year old, to the New York Times.”

When NY State's own health department showed fracking is safe, Gov. Andrew Cuomo buried the report and continued delays.  

http://pjmedia.com/instapundit/160973/

Remember when the authorities used to cover up dangers? Now they’re covering up news that fracking is safe, because that harms their political agenda.

9% of the population of NY State has gotten out in the last decade: 

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/28/here-are-the-10-freest-states-in-the-u-s-and-the-least/

http://freedominthe50states.org/download/print-edition.pdf

9.0 percent of the state’s 2000 population, on net, left the state for another state between 2000 and 2011, the highest such figure in the nation. 

When NINE PERCENT of your taxable base up and leaves in just over a decade, you've got problems.

Just A Friendly Reminder: 

The Official Unemployment

Rate Keeps Dropping Because 

The Labor Force Keeps SHRINKING.  

It Is Now The Same Size It Was In 1981

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/post/the-incredible-shrinking-labor-force/2012/05/04/gIQANXAy1T_blog.html

It IS kind of amazing to consider there are now just as many people working as there was in 1982 DESPITE over 30 years worth of population growth and immigration.  

Global Warming Policy Is 

Killing People Already

While 250,000 people in the UK have died from cold since 2003, just 20,000 have died from heat.  

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/elderhealth/9959856/Its-the-cold-not-global-warming-that-we-should-be-worried-about.html

Due to totally buying the global warming fraud, the UK has drastically ramped down it's oil and gas production, closing coal-fired electrical plants and pouring trillions of wealth into useless solar and wind power farms.  The result being a terrible shortage of power last winter that caused power failures and some near misses in some areas, a doubling of energy prices in the past 7 years, and elderly and poor people FREEZING TO DEATH in ever greater numbers.  

So many people are now being forced into making an awful decision:  freeze or eat? Heat or food?  

The Great Global Warming Fraud can't be exposed fast enough.  

http://freebeacon.com/science-earth-not-warming-over-last-15-years/

Like Michael Crichton, I knew back in the late 1990's the moment we would be able to check the computer model predictions the fraudsters were using to gin up the hysteria the whole thing would start coming apart. 

I agree with DrewM: 

http://minx.cc/?post=338782

After trillions in wealth has been wasted and misdirected and countless lives lost because of AGW Fraud, it's infuriating that not a single person will ever end up in prison because of this scam.  

Hopelessly In Debt & Facing Bankruptcy, 
San Bernardino, CA Is Contemplating A
Rather Novel Way Out Of It's Predicament:
Death

http://www.city-journal.org/2013/cjc0325jr.html

As Maetenloch noted on this story: 

San Bernardino, CA is completely bankrupt but filing for bankruptcy still may not save it from CalPERS debt, insanely generous union benefits and pension payments that could take up 75% of the city's budget.But there is another option: death.

And lets end with this:  

The Guy Who Leaked The East Anglia 

Climate-Gate EMails Tells Why He Did It:

FOR THE POOR 

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/03/13/climategate-3-0-has-occurred-the-password-has-been-released/

This guy should get a freaking Nobel Prize.  Instead, he'll have to keep his identity secret until the day he dies.  

Stupid Liberals Doing 

Stupidly: 

NY Gov. Cuomo's New 'SAFE' Law

Ensnares It's First 'Criminal': 

An Iraqi War Hero Who Sold

A 10 Rd Magazine In An AR-15

Liberals refuse to solve the real gun crime problem, so they'll write stupid laws like this SAFE Act to criminalize ordinary gun owners/sellers and then prosecute them.  To show they 'care' and are 'doing something' about guns.  Beyond pathetic.  

I'm a moron, folks. I'm now calling for the repeal of a main provision

in a law I pushed the legislature to pass in a hurry just a month ago.

http://buffalonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20130320/CITYANDREGION/130329919/1010

Nobody makes a freaking 7 round magazine, something that Andrew Cuomo finally got around to realizing just a few days ago.  

http://washingtonexaminer.com/cuomo-new-law-banning-magazines-over-seven-rounds-should-be-repealed/article/2524994

“There is no such thing as a seven-bullet magazine. That doesn’t exist. So you really have no practical option,” New York Governor Andrew Cuomo admitted yesterday at a news conference, explaining why his tough ban on ammunition magazines over seven rounds should be repealed. 

The bill must be repealed if New Yorkers ever want to purchase an ammunition magazine for their firearm.

Cuomo explained yesterday, however, that the new law will only allow citizens to put seven bullets in the magazines, unless they are at a shooting range.

Smart people tried to tell the liberals up there in NY this BEFORE they passed the SAFE Act that nobody makes a 7 round magazine, but anyone who spoke up trying to stop the law's passage or pointing out how unworkable it was, hey they must be right wing extremists and who pays attention to THOSE people?  

They wrote this thing & passed it so fast it didn't even occur to them to exempt police from it.  

http://www.humanevents.com/2013/01/18/goofball-new-york-legislators-forget-to-exempt-the-police-from-tough-new-gun-laws/

And note that if you get caught with a gun in NY state that has eight rounds in it instead of just seven, you've committed a felony.  Yes, you're reading that correctly.  Cuomo wants the law amended to read the act of putting an eighth round in a 10 round magazine is a felony worth up to seven years in prison.  

So - 7 bullets you're a law abiding citizen.  8 bullets in the gun? You're a dangerous menace to society and a criminal.  Thank God there's a court system to protect the rest of us from people like  you.  

Did I already say this was beyond pathetic?  I did?  Not one criminal with a gun in NY State will turn in a single magazine.  But you'll see a whole slew of honest people like Benjamin Wassell get dragged to court, maybe even get prison time, so stupid Liberals like Cuomo can smugly pretend they're 'fixing the gun problem'.  

It's Been Six Months Since The 

Benghazi Terrorist Attack -

And This Administration 

Continues To Stonewall 

Congress & Avoid Any 

Responsibility Over It

How bad is it?  The Congress can't even get this White House, State Dept. or CIA to simply TELL them who ANY of the Benghazi survivors are.  There are around 30.  Despite explicitly asking repeatedly for these survivors testimony about what happened that fateful night, not one name has been forthcoming. 

The White House keeps turning over heavily redacted information then claiming they've 'complied'with Congresses' requests. 

Imagine getting boxes full of papers that looked like this one & then 

having the prick that sent it to you claiming he's 'complied' with 

your request for information. Welcome to Darrell Issa's world.

CBS New's Sharyl Attkisson continues to be the ONLY major news network reporter demanding to know why this information hasn't been released to Congress yet: 

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57573613/six-months-later-where-are-the-benghazi-survivors/

Today marks six months since the September 11, 2012 terrorist attacks on the U.S. compounds in Benghazi, Libya in which four Americans were killed, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens. Some watchdog groups, members of the media and Republican members of Congress are asking: Where are the more than two dozen U.S. personnel who survived the attack but haven't been seen nor heard from in public since? There were also an undisclosed number of witnesses at the U.S. compounds in Tripoli but they also have not spoken publicly.

In a recent press report, Secretary of State John Kerry said he visited one survivor at "Bethesda hospital," and referred to him a "remarkably courageous person who is doing very, very well." Kerry added, "I've called his wife and talked to her." But the identities, condition and testimony of the survivors and witnesses have been closely held from the public.

Over 100 guys with automatic weapons, mortars and 

techinicals with 50. cal. guns on the back =

'spontaneous demonstration' according to this White House

One reason the administration doesn't want to see the Benghazi survivors testify about the events of the night of September 11, 2012, is that their  testimony before Congress will likely diverge from the administration's story as to what happened. 

The administration has claimed repeatedly no requests for help from Tyrone Woods or Glenn Doherty were denied.  Woods, Doherty & others were in constant radio contact with both the State Dept. and the CIA that night.   The White House, State Dept. and the CIA all had members that testified under oath and assured various media reporters that no requests for aid were turned down during the seven hour attack.  

The White House also embarked on a two week attempt to sell a false narrative to the country about the Benghazi attack being the result of a 'spontaneous demonstration' due to an inflammatory YouTube video.  Members of Congress have thus far been unable to get the White House to put forth ANY evidence they had that pointed to any kind of protest or demonstration in Benghazi that day or night of September 11.   The Benghazi survivors will no doubt be asked about this.  Especially in light of the fact the administration has already admitted they WATCHED the attack via overhead drone cameras.  How could they end up selling the video narrative when they knew from the first night how organized and heavily armed the attackers were? 

Another sign of a cover-up is that the administration claimed several people had been 'fired' over Benghazi who actually weren't fired at all, an obvious attempt to give some kind of fake accountability and then quickly move on that backfired when the truth came out: 

http://www.nypost.com/p/news/international/benghazi_penalties_are_bogus_ncP7RZx5uTIgDPbTp5WtoN

"So we really didn't fire them like we said we did. 

What difference, at this point, does it make??!!!"

Hillary Clinton then had to 'explain' during her testimony before Congress why it was 'erroneously reported' that these four State. Dept. officials had been fired when in actual fact all had been placed on 'administrative leave' and were keeping their jobs: 

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/23/clinton-finally-explains-why-the-four-state-dept-employees-blasted-for-leadership-failures-in-benghazi-report-have-not-been-fired/#

Did the White House EVER have any evidence of the attack being as a result of a protest over a video?  Evidence has certainly mounted that from the time the attack was *STILL UNFOLDING* it was an organized terrorist attack, and yet for two weeks afterwards the White House attempted to sell the video idea.  

If 9-11-12 was a planned terrorist attack on the anniversary of 9-11-01, and if the administration had been stripping security from one of the most dangerous diplomatic postings in the world, then this administration had a lot to answer for.  Which is why it looks like they desperately attempted to sell a false narrative to the public for several weeks.  It was just another example of how this administration will never accept responsibility for it's own policy decisions and instead will simply lie.  

This very well could have been a full scale massacre with over two dozen dead Americans.  It was only the quick thinking, actions, and self-sacrificing bravery of two former Navy SEALs that the Benghazi survivors managed to escape. 

The American people deserve to know the truth about what happened that night.  I don't see the White House's attempts to stonewall lasting much longer.  

I did not write this poem. It's making away around the 'net. Kudos to the original author.