You Can't Win A Fight Against Islamic Terrorist Fanatics With Politically Correct Methods

Two years ago the Taliban attacked a 15 year old girl because she was - get this - going to school. The Taliban shot Malala Yousufzai in the head. She survived & won a Nobel Prize. 

Young girls in Pakistan pray for Malala Yousafzai after she was shot in the head by the Taliban

Today the Taliban carried out an attack on a school in Pakistan that is Malala x 100. Over 80 children did not survive this brutal terrorism. 

This comes one day after another Islamic lunatic took hostages in Australia, killing two of them before police killed him.   

Katrina Dawson died trying to shield her pregnant friend from the terrorist gunman. 

Tori Johnson attempted to disarm the terrorist. 

The Islamic terrorist fanatics out there sure picked a good time to remind everybody why you want to prevent terrorist attacks.

I realize, of course, that this presents a problem to the Left here in America, given that their agenda calls for a couple more weeks of browbeating the country over water boarding the guys who pulled off 9/11.  

Aw gee. Did Islamic terrorists killing two heroes yesterday and putting over 80 kids into body bags today interrupt the moral preening of the Left over water boarding? Yes, as over 80 kids go into body bags, by all means keep lecturing the rest of us about how the CIA's EIT program = absolute evil.

This is why we're winning. We don't have to TRY to prove the Left is insane. They keep demonstrating it. The Left runs around the country berating the rest of us about 'rape culture' & rampant, systemic racism/misogyny that's only in their heads.

And they have just kicked off what was supposed to be a months-long browbeating of the rest of us over water boarding the 9/11 masterminds.

[Just like they had supposedly kicked off a months long period of haranguing the rest of us about 'rape culture' due to Rolling Stone's UVA gang rape hoax. Oops! ]

And then the goddamned Islamic fanatics had to go and RUIN EVERYTHING by acting up at the most inopportune time.

It'd be fine if the fight with the Insane Left on political correctness was just over domestic policy like the 'rape culture' hoax. But it's not. They want to handcuff America with political correctness in how it deals with issues abroad as well. Including threats abroad. Like terrorists. Like the Taliban. 

Want some examples? 

1.  Hillary Clinton wants to 'empathize' with our enemies. 

"This is what we call smart power," Clinton said to a small audience at Georgetown. "Using every possible tool and partner to advance peace and security. Leaving no one on the sidelines. Showing respect even for one's enemies. Trying to understand, in so far as psychologically possible, empathize with their perspective and point of view. Helping to define the problems, determine the solutions. That is what we believe in the 21st century will change -- change the prospects for peace."

How in God's name do you 'empathize' with someone who can go into a school and gun down a room full of children?

The Taliban shot Malala in the head because they don't want girls going to school. How FAR could you 'empathize' with a point of view that holds women to be chattel, slaves, second class citizens not worthy of an education or rights? What actions could you take to make them like you better? What accommodations would you be willing to make? You begin to see how absurd this is? 

Hillary can't help it, of course. As I demonstrated last year with a little help from Thomas Sowell, Hillary MUST constantly demonstrate how special and above ordinary her views are. 

2.  Ft. Hood = 'workplace violence'

A line from Army Major Nidal Hasan's slideshow presentation before a group of fellow military psychiatrists: "We love death more then [sic] you love life." 

Leaving aside the fact political correctness resulted in a barely literate religious fanatic getting into the US Army & rising to the level of Major, and despite the fact he's constantly saying insane shit to his fellow workers about his Islamic beliefs, let's just deal with the aftermath of Nidal Hasan  shooting over 40 people, 13 of them fatally.  

A Muslim fanatic shot over 40 people while screaming 'ALLAH AKBAR!' but hey...workplace violence! 

Hasan made no secret of the fact it was his Islamic beliefs that motivated him to engage in the Ft. Hood massacre.  That clearly made this incident a terrorist attack.  And yet the Obama administration insisted from the beginning this was NOT a terrorist attack, labeling it a case of 'workplace violence'.  

To admit this was a terrorist attack would mean vastly more scrutiny of the terrorist himself, and those who kept enabling him until he struck.  Rather than do that, it was decided to quietly deal with this incident as just another workplace shooting.  

3.  Joe Biden lectures Ayaan Hirsi Ali about Islam. 

"Another couple of minutes, I'd have totally set that Hirsi Ali lady straight about Islam."

What could Hirsi Ali possibly know about Islam? She only:

1. Grew up in an Islamic family living in an Islamic country
2. Was genitally mutilated as a young girl according to Islamic practice
3. Ran away to avoid an arranged marriage under Islamic law

But thank God she's got Joe Biden to set her straight about what's what, eh? 

4.  Bill Clinton boasting to an audience on 9/10/2001 that he turned down several opportunities to get Osama Bin Laden. 

"I *never* turned down bin Laden!"

In fact, Clinton had numerous attempts to get Bin Laden and turned them down.  Too problematic, too much collateral damage, legally bothersome, there was always some reason to not act.  

As I blogged several years ago, Clinton's refusal to take quick action against Bin Laden actually led to the development of the Predator drone strike program by the CIA: 

Yeah, About That Evil Drone Strike Program Developed Under the Bush Administration...

Clinton low keyed every single terrorist attack on his watch, from the 1st WTC attack onward. All through the Khobar Towers, African embassy bombings, the USS Cole, he was determined to do the politically correct thing & downplay it as just a criminal act handled by the FBI.  

5. Obama/Holder insisting on civilian trials for the 9/11 masterminds.

"Why the blue f**k haven't you guys killed me yet?"

Explain to me why KSM is still alive after over 12 years in US custody. Why is that? He plotted, carried out an attack that = 3000 dead.  Are they pumping him for more info on terrorists still at large? No? Then why the hell isn't he dead yet?

The only reason KSM is still alive is that Obama & Holder ended the military tribunals.  They were determined to try him in a civilian court.

At the time, KSM & the other 2 terrorists were willing to plead guilty & proceed straight to execution. But Obama wanted a show.

Thus is seen the full blown political correctness of pretending terrorists from other countries who are unlawful combatants must get full US citizenship rights.  Or the terrorists have won or something.  

THAT'S the only reason KSM & these other dirtbags are still alive. We know they're guilty, they've admitted their role in 9/11.

You know how unlawful combatants are treated according to the Geneva Conventions? If you get caught on a battlefield out of uniform, you can be summarily executed on the spot.  

Like the Viet Cong in the picture below, captured out of uniform right after he'd just gotten done slaughtering a bunch of civilian families.  Probably the most famous unlawful combatant execution ever.  

Once you've proven a son of a bitch is a terrorist, you kill the bastard. Instead we're on this 'Islamophobia' kick here in the West.

Bring Back The Pirate Code: Find A Pirate, Hang A Pirate

Until we go back to dealing with Islamic terrorist fanatics using the old pirate codes, this the kind of shit we'll be dealing with.

You caught a pirate, you hanged the son of a bitch.

The fact the Somali pirates were able to become a thing & a real threat to int'l shipping in the 21st century was a joke. The only reason the threat of hostages & ransoms has grown to the absolutely ridiculous level it is? We wouldn't sink their boats.

You think from the very start, years ago, it wasn't possible to shoot the bastards/sink their boats as they made their approach?  Of course sinking the Somali pirate boats before they reached Western shipping was possible. But nobody wanted to DO it.

And so we end up with a situation where the problem just got worse, more ships looted, more hostages grabbed, more ransoms paid.  Until finally the world's other navy's had enough a' this shit and started SHOOTING them and sinking their boats.

All that drama because Western nations forgot: YOU F**KING HANG PIRATES.

And now the same kind of politically correct thinking that messed up dealing with pirates is messing up dealing with terrorists. 

Remember When The Social Justice Warriors Used To Get Away With It? 

It Wasn't THAT Long Ago That False Narratives Killed People & Set Killers Free

What's that I hear on the internet today? DNC Media hacks whining about why this UVA Rape Scandal is still a thing? Why hasn't it died yet and could everyone please just move on already? 

You Social Justice Warriors out there really hoped to browbeat the rest of America with your rape culture rhetoric for a couple more months? You're really sad the narrative was exposed so soon? 

Well tough.  Get used to it. 

Because there are those of us who remember how the Social Justice Warriors & their media enablers tore this country apart every chance they got in the past.  

Not only did your false narratives back then get people killed, they also ensured killers walked free.  

It's time to recount a little history.  

False Narrative History Lesson #1: The Truth About The LA Riots

The brutal truth about the LA riots is that they never would have happened if the truth had been given 1/10th the coverage the fake racial narrative was.  Here's a concrete case where the pushing of a false narrative worked like a charm when there was no New Media to push back against it or expose it. The false narrative led to more than 50 people being killed in the riots.  

If you think the story of Rodney King was that of a passing motorist being dragged from his car by 5 racist police officers who immediately set about trying to beat him to death with batons because he was black, then congratulations.  You bought the false narrative.  You don't know what really happened that night.  

As usual, the race hucksters got there first to ensure the most racially inflammatory version of events was communicated to the public through the media. And the media back then never tried to actually fact check the story they were putting out.  In fact, some of the media actual stoked the racial fires by deliberately suppressing evidence in the case.  

Here are the facts of the Rodney King arrest:

1. Rodney King committed a traffic infraction. CA. Highway patrol attempted a traffic stop. He ran from them. 
2. King ran stop signs & red lights in a miles-long chase that ended in a spot where police had recently been ambushed by a gang. King only stopped because his 2 passengers, also black males, finally managed to talk him into pulling over.  
3. LAPD had joined in the case & now took command. The 2 black passengers followed instructions and exited the car with their hands up. Both were patted down, handcuffed without incident. 
4. King finally exited the car, & proceeded to babble to himself and shake his butt at the female CHP holding a gun on him.  
5. Noting that King was acting strangely & was obviously not going to comply with the lawful orders he was being given, Sgt. Stacey Koon had his men put their guns away. 
6. Having tried the first step in the LAPD procedure for use of force - verbal commands with a drawn handgun - and failed, Koon now moved on to 2nd step - the swarm.  
7.  Four large male police officers 'swarmed' King, tackling him according to procedure & attempting to wrestle him onto his stomach so they could handcuff him. They failed in this attempt when King threw off all four officers and got back onto his feet. 
8.  Sgt. Koon now moved on to the 3rd step in official LAPD use of force policy - the taser.  He proceeded to tase King twice.  To everyone's shocked surprise, King did not go down. 
9.  Not only did King not go down, he began to get combative, moving towards the officers and trying to grapple with them. 
10. Under Sgt. Koon's direction, four officers resorted to the 4th step on the LAPD use of force policy - the batons.  Using full power swings, they repeatedly struck King on the arms, upper back, and legs while ordering him to lie down and put his hands behind his back. 
11. Incredibly, Rodney King managed to get off the ground several times while the batons were being used on him and tried to grab the officers.  
12.  Finally, after almost 2 minutes of being hit repeatedly with full power baton strikes, Rodney King at last gives up. 
13. Immediately all officers put their batons away and handcuff him & place him in one of the patrol cars.  

Now we've all seen the videotape of the Rodney King arrest.  That is, we've all seen the EDITED videotape of the Rodney King arrest.  When the media got their hands on the tape, somebody decided to CUT OUT the first 18 seconds of the tape.  Why this happened will become crystal clear when you see what those first few seconds showed.  

Take a look: 

The guy making the video captured the LAST TIME King came up off the ground and charged at one of the officers and tried to grapple with them.  For some reason, it was decided these first few seconds of the video needed to be cut out.  They weren't helpful to the narrative, you see.  

Note every time King lies still and stops moving the cops stop hitting him.  Note the lull in strikes around 1:02 to 1:20 of the video.  He's on his stomach, hands out at his sides, and he stops moving.  The cops stop swinging, seeing if he's going to move those hands behind his back.  Only when he begins moving again as he attempts to rise up onto all fours do they resume hitting him.  It needs to be pointed out: this could have ended at ANY TIME by his choosing to comply with their orders. The only reason it took a 20 mile car chase, orders at gunpoint, a failed swarm, 2 tasing attempts, and then almost 2 full minutes of baton-swinging is because that's how Rodney King wanted it to go.  

Not until 1:40 of the video does King appear to give up while in a sitting position, placing his hands behind his head.  He's still not doing what they told him, but note they stop using the batons on him at that point.  Because he's finally given up, they easily move him onto his stomach & apply the handcuffs.  

If they wanted to kill King, why not simply shoot him? Why did they put the batons away once he signaled he was giving up if this was in fact a brutal racially motivated beating? 

The jury at the 1st trial didn't make it's decision based on the narrative being spun by Al Sharpton & his ilk in the media. They rendered a verdict based on the EVIDENCE presented at the trial.  The system worked exactly like it was supposed to.  

AND THEN THE MOB BUILT UP BY A FALSE NARRATIVE OVERTURNED THAT.  

Social Justice demanded a guilty verdict, & because they didn't get it, a big angry mob burned down 1/2 of LA and killed 58 people.  As a direct result of the riots, the officers were tried again at the federal level and 2 of them - Sgt. Stacey Koon & Lawrence Powell - were convicted of violating Rodney King's civil rights.

Officer Stacey Koon on the far left, & Officer Lawrence Powell on the far right, were both sentenced to prison because 'social justice' demanded it.  Or else. 

In the end, justice was perverted & the mob did get 2 of the scalps they were after.  

False Narrative History Lesson #2: The Truth About The OJ Simpson Trial

There was a time when many people thought the advancement of 'social justice'  in America required that a brutal double murderer walk free. And they got what they wanted. 

How? Quite simple, really. Race was injected into the case until OJ Simpson walking free would 'prove' something to White America.  You still meet people today more upset about the fact Mark Furhman talked tough for a screenplay & said the 'N' word than about the fact OJ Simpson practically cut Nicole's head off.  

Orenthal James Simpson butchered these two people like they were hogs. And he never did a single day in jail for it.  Because 'social justice' or something. 

The false narrative at the OJ Simpson trial was that a group of racists cops got together & decided to frame OJ Simpson for the murders of Nicole Simpson & Ronald Goldman.  As Vincent Bugliosi stated in his book about the case, 'Outrage', it was 'in the air' that OJ was going to get away with the murders.    

Who cared what the evidence actually showed? Mark Furhman had lied about saying the dreaded N word! And this obviously proved that he & a bunch of guys he'd never worked with before that night got together on the spur of the moment & decided to frame an innocent black celebrity for a brutal double homicide.  Because racism.  

Johnnie Cochran, F. Lee Bailey & the rest of the 'Dream Team' had decided to make the case about race.  They deliberately stoked fear & resentment of past police brutality cases & asked the jury to find Simpson not guilty in order to make up for all the times the police got away with doing bad things in the past.  

Juries like the one in the Simpson trial were asked to engage in 'nullification', which meant don't even consider the evidence, just send a message to The Man by acquitting an obviously guilty person.  Social Justice will advance when you 'nullify' the evidence & decide a case based on the races of the defendants and the victims.  

And that's how we ended up with the spectacle of blacks all across America cheering loudly as OJ Simpson walked out of court a free man while whites watched in disbelief.  

America Has Had Enough Of This 'Social Justice' Bullshit

After what happened in the LA Riots and the OJ Simpson trial, Americans had gotten an eyeful of what 'social justice' resulted in.  Dead people, burned & looted stores, racial discord, & killers going free.  

That's why the last couple of times the Social Justice Warriors have tried to launch a new false narrative, it hasn't gone so swell.  They had a great start in the Duke Rape Case,  and then the facts came out,  the charges were dropped, and the prosecutor got himself disbarred.  The designated victims all were proven innocent and got away.  The mob was disappointed.  Social Justice didn't advance, darn it! 

The case in Sanford FL, the false narrative there resulted in more than two years of the DNC Media trying to save a dying racial narrative by calling Zimmerman a 'white Hispanic'.  It didn't matter. The facts came out at the trial.  The system worked.  Again, the mob didn't get the scalp it demanded.  Social justice - denied! 

Then came Ferguson, Missouri and the Michael Brown case.  Once again the most racially inflammatory version of the story was rushed out the door to the mob.  And again, it didn't matter in the end. The facts came out. The false narrative fell apart.  Not shot in the back and no hands up.  No matter how many stores they looted or businesses they burned down, the mob didn't get the scalp it screamed for.  The system worked and social justice was denied again.  And don't think the rest of America didn't see who ginned up the mob & unleashed it on that poor town.  

The UVA Case Is Latest Attempt To Bring About 'Social Justice' By Lying

Which brings us to the UVA Rape Scandal currently ongoing.  Once again the Social Justice Warriors were fighting hard to advance 'progress' in America by, uh, well, pushing a false story. And they got caught at it.  

If you can't advocate for your agenda by sticking to the truth, maybe your agenda just sucks? If there really is a rape epidemic or crisis due to a 'rape culture' in America, why can't evidence of this be supplied from real cases? 

On the other hand, if the agenda is based on fantasy, then this would explain why the cases proffered to 'prove' the crisis keep ending up being hoaxes.  If there's no rape crisis, and you really do believe 'social justice' can only advance if you 'prove' there is one, the temptation to invent will be there.  

Sabrina Rubin Erdely, author of the Rolling Stone piece on the UVA gang rape, appears to have done exactly this, had a strong desire to 'prove' there is a burgeoning rape culture on America's campuses.  And so off she went, looking for someone that would tell her a story that would 'fit' what she was looking for.  

And once she found that special person that would tell her the kind of story she was looking for, of course the story was far too good and useful to fact check for accuracy and verification.  And so here we are, in the midst of another example of a media that would much rather push narratives to promote pet causes than find the truth.  

These false narratives have to be destroyed.  And the quicker they are destroyed the better.  Because if these lies take root & grow, the fruit they bear is always rotten and for some, they can prove fatal. 

This is where the New Media comes in.  We can hold the Social Justice Warriors in check.  We can expose their new narratives while they are still on the launching pads, before they can cause too much damage.  We can force them to do what they desperately want to avoid having to do: 

Argue honestly for their lunatic social justice agenda.  

Because is it not obvious that if they could get where they wanted to go by telling the truth, they would?

If ICE/DHS Knew 65,000+ Illegal Minors Would Get Apprehended At Our Border This Year, How Exactly Did this Border Crisis 'Sneak Up' On Them?

This ad that appeared back in January of this year on the Fed Biz.gov website is damning.  Take a look at it.  

The document you can download as 'Juvenile Transport RFI (TONY Edits 1:29. 14 doc) has an opening section that reads thusly: 

(Click on the screenshot to see it at full size)

Read the first 6 sentences carefully.  What facts can be glean from this employment ad? 

1. ICE/DHS knew back in January 2014 that 65,000 illegal minors would be apprehended on the US's southwestern border this year.  

This is very curious since a 65,000 figure is more than DOUBLE the number of illegal minors apprehended the year before, according to the U.S. Customs & Border Protection's official website: 

In all of FY 2013, 26,206 UAC were caught at the border.  By just June of this year, that number had doubled to 52,193, a 99% increase.  

Here are the totals of unaccompanied minors apprehended on the border from 2008-2012 according to the U.S. Border Patrol's official PDF: 

Note that is is cleverly set up to disguise what particular border these minors were caught at. Instead of dividing the total by sectors, it's set up to just list every single country & how many minors were caught from each. Still, it's not hard to take a little time and add up the number of minors caught from countries to the South of the United States.  

2008: 7,988
2009: 19,599
2010: 18,467
2011: 15,853
2012: 24,394
2013: 26,206
2014: 52,193 [so far]

[UPDATE!] Someone at Investor's Business Daily was on the ball, made this very telling graphic based on the figures from above: 

2.  Instead of being deported, these 65,000 UAC were going to be classified as refugees and relocated by escorts to shelters throughout the continental United States. 

This is what is now happening places like Murrieta, CA.  ICE is attempting to send the illegals to towns that will be forced to help support them.  The gov't knew a huge, never before seen influx of minors was going to need to be resettled and were looking to hire escorts to ferry the kids to the shelters. 

3.  The ICE plan, formulated before January 2014, called for escorts traveling with the alien minors to these shelters by 25% local ground transport, 25% ICE charter and 50% commercial air.  

These facts, undisputed by the Government, which has vouched for the authenticity of the ad, leads to the real question that every member of Congress and every American citizen needs to consider: 

IF they knew this flood of kids was coming, HOW did they end up so unprepared for it?  

 65,000+ alien minors getting apprehended at our borders in a single fiscal year would absolutely swamp our present immigration/border system.  Authorities HAD to know a huge influx of this size would overwhelm present resources.  And yet beyond hiring escorts and setting up a few hastily prepared camps on some military bases, they appear to have done NOTHING to get ready for it. 

Do you remember ANYBODY in Washington discussing this coming tidal wave of kids back in January? How about February? No?  OK then....March? April? May? Hello? ANYONE?!  Why *didn't* they talk about it? Why did no one in the government sound the alarm? 

Obama is only NOW getting around to authorizing $2 billion in emergency spending to build shelters for the kids that ICE/DHS knew were coming over seven months ago.  

As yet, nobody in this government has had to answer how they knew the numbers would increase so dramatically more than 100% over the preceding year.  Or how, having known it, they didn't prepare for it. 

Don't buy the bullshit being spread by the media that Obama & the DHS are being 'forced' to relocate these kids ot shelters all over the country.  That ad from back in January demonstrates THEY PLANNED TO DO THIS ALL ALONG. 

Progressives Have Been Caught Covering Up Their Real Goals Yet AGAIN In The Hobby Lobby Case

Amazing how many people think the Hobby Lobby decision was about forcing the company to provide birth control to it's employees.  

Hobby Lobby was ALREADY providing birth control coverage to it's employees.  16 different types of it, in fact.  What can we draw from the fact that many of the people blathering about this case don't know that?  

The real issue in the Hobby Lobby case was whether the government could force private businesses/corporations into providing abortifacients.

First of all, let's be clear:  abortion/taking an abortifacient is not birth control. I don't care how many shrieking leftists say different.   Birth control prevents the egg and the sperm from coming together. An abortion/abortifacient destroys an already fertilized egg.

Now, if you think it's a popular position in America to FORCE other people to pay for ABORTIONS, you haven't seen  the  polls  then.

Forcing somebody to pay for something is forcing them to participate in it. It can't be argued any other way.  Like it or not, many people have objections to abortion & don't want to be compelled into funding it.

What Hobby Lobby vs. Sebelius  decided was that American citizens who form a closely-held corporation do not lose their rights by doing business together.  The Obama DOJ attempted to argue that people who join together to form a corporation and do business as a group lose basic American rights when they do so.

The Court found just because you and several other people joined together to form a corporation to do business DOESN'T mean you & they lose your basic rights.  If for religious reasons you want to opt out of a program that would FORCE you to fund the purchase of abortifacients, the Supreme Court found that  you have a RIGHT based on the 1st Amendment to do so.

This finding by the Court that the 1st Amendment clause on religious conscience applies to folks in business together has incensed Liberals.

Due to misinformation spread by the DNC-Media-Complex, many still think all this was about DENYING birth control. Far from it.  But the media perception of the case has been deliberately manipulated to provide a false understanding of it. 

Progressives are incapable of honestly arguing for their goals. Misinformation/distortion is necessary to cover up their plans.

"We would like to force employers to pay for abortions/abortifacients" had to be sensationalized by media propaganda into 'provide birth control'.

To low info people who get their news from ABC, NBC, CBS, Daily Kos, TPM, or MSNBC, that's what this case has always been about: birth control.  It's supposedly about evil religious bigots refusing to fork over a few bucks so poor desperate women could have access to birth control because....#WARONWOMEN!

Most people have noticed how stupid on it's face this argument is. The issue is not access but who pays for it.

And so we've had months of misdirection, with media liberals shrieking about how refusing to pay for birth control = denying access to it or even more hilariously, an attempt to 'ban' it. 

But even in that misdirection, they were successful in selling their idea that this entire case was about birth control.  It had to be about birth control because the people in DC driving this case are WELL AWARE of poll results on what the public thinks about forcing people to pay for abortions.

If they had openly and honestly advocated for forcing people to pay for abortion/abortifacients, this case goes nowhere with the public.

"Force my religious employer to pay for my birth control!" is a much, MUCH easier sell than "Force him to pay for my abortifacients!"

There is a wealth of research & polls going all the way back to the 1970's showing how Americans feel about gov't funded abortion.  Americans don't want tax dollars used for abortions. Neither would they want employers being forced to fund it.

How underhanded has Obama & his HHS been? Recall that when the Affordable Care Act passed, the HHS mandate wasn't a part of it.  No, REGULATORS tacked that HHS mandate on there AFTER it had passed. Bart Stupak & others never would have voted for the ACA if a mandate forcing employers to provide coverage for abortifacients was included. 

Remember how Stupak told the media how betrayed he felt once the HHS rolled out the mandate? He realized Obama & the party leaders had played him.   He said he and other pro-life Dems would not have voted for the ACA if abortifacient funding was part of it. So they had to be tricked.

And in the end, when you get right down to it, that's the only strategy in the Progressive playbook. They have to TRICK people to advance.  ObamaCare, Global Warming, this present border crisis, no matter the issue, Progressives can't come right  out & say what they want.

"Millions of you will lose your health plans & Dr.'s, but it's OK because your new, higher cost plans will subsidize insurance for others!"

Is THAT how Obama & Co. sold the ACA for 3 years?  Be honest, now.

You think Obama & Co. didn't know how the ACA would actually work, how that 15% without insurance was going to get it paid for?  Of course they did. Millions of people had to be forced to newer higher cost plans to pay for the new insurance of others.  "If  you like your plan you can keep your plan!" was all about keeping most people from realizing what was about to happen.

Remember the other huge whopper that they told their stupid base to get it to go along with it's own forth-coming fleecing?  "Oh hey, this won't cost you anything anyway, this new huge entitlement we're creating here. Rich people will foot the bill, not you!"

Amazing how the rubes keep falling for that one, isn't it? 

The first thing you have to do when studying an issue where Obama & his progressive friends are moving is learn: what are they REALLY after?

Global warming is about fooling people into thinking there's a real threat waaay off there in the future so hand them huge amounts of wealth & power now to reorder society as they see fit.   Hobby Lobby was about gutting the 1st Amendment religious conscience clause & forcing employers to pay for abortions/abortifacients.  The ongoing border crisis is about getting to amnesty no matter how they get there.  ObamaCare was about preparing the way for single payer destabilizing the insurance market. 

No matter what the issue is, Obama & Co. can't honestly argue for their goals since they are well aware they'd be rejected.

But - get this! - the people who try to stop them from reaching their dishonest, extreme goals are the 'extremists'.

Did you tell the truth about ObamaCare before it passed & was implemented? 
Well you just hated sick people and wanted them to die.  Plus you were just mad there's a black fellow living in the White House. 

Are you telling the truth about their Global warming scam right now? 
That just shows you hate the planet & want it to burn up.

Do you accurately reject the White House's arguments on Hobby Lobby? 
Well then you hate women or something.

Have you repeatedly questioned Obama's insane open borders/selective immigration law enforcement? 
You're a racist that hates poor people who don't look like you.

Say....is anybody noticing a....TREND.... there?

Let me set your mind at ease, if you've been troubled the past 6 years.

Did you want to keep the health insurance plan & Dr. you were happy with? 
Then no, you don't hate sick people & want them to die.

Would you like unemployment to drop & wages to rise w.out the gov't dictating it artificially?
Then no, you're not a racist on immigration.

Do you object to employers being forced to fund abortions if it's against their religion? 
Then nope, you're not engaging in #WARONWOMEN

Would you like a sane energy policy that isn't dependant on outdated computer models & bogus science? 
Then no, you don't hate the planet and want to see all the cute, fluffy polar bears diiiiie.  

To reach your extremist goal, you have to create propaganda to convince enough people what you really want is something else.  And the progressive agenda for America IS extreme. This is why they are 'forced' to lie to get anywhere on their goals.  And the Democrat-Media-Complex plays a huge role in selling the Progressive propaganda to the public.

Now this latest ObamaCare-related issue, the Hobby Lobby case, the media relentlessly sold it as being about 'birth control'.   And that's EXACTLY what the vast majority of people think the case was about, then. Because that's what they heard on the news.

Newsflash: Hobby Lobby provided 16 different types of birth control coverage to it's employees. What they WOULDN'T provide? Abortifacients.  But thanks to the Democrat-Media Complex, most people out there don't know that. It's #WARONWOMEN 24/7, etc.

I mean, you tell somebody the fact "Hobby Lobby was already providing coverage for 16 different kinds of birth control!" and you can see them blinking.  DOES....NOT...COMPUTE.....

When the business already paid for 16 different types of birth control, the issue was NOT....paying for birth control.  #AREWECLEAR?

"Hmmm. 16 different kinds of birth control available, you say? Well then I guess the issue WASN'T birth control then. Whatever could it have been?!  Hold on while I Google!"

Oh and hey, make no mistake. After Obama & HHS rammed this mandate through & forced employers to pay for abortifacients, actual abortion was coming next. As sure as night follows day.

Now you know why the Progressive Left is in a mouth-foaming fury at the Court's stopping this thing right in it's tracks.

Young Girls Are Being Raped In A Humanitarian Crisis This President DELIBERATELY Created 

Barack Obama is a malignant narcissist leaving a trail of destruction and ruined lives in his thoughtless wake. If it's not our former allies in Iraq getting executed by ISIL, it's kids getting raped on their way to Obama's open borders. We've reached the stage where the human cost of Obama's stupid decisions, dereliction of duty & outright lawlessness is far too high.

Texas Democratic Rep. Henry Cuellar can't believe what's he's seeing on the border

Texas Officials Discovering Almost 1/3rd Of Young Girls In The Internment Camps Have Been Raped

With the oppressive summer heat “it’s going to be very, very dangerous in this part of the country to have young kids women and other folks to come in,” says Texas Congressman Henry Cuellar (D-Laredo, TX) 

On Monday a South Texas sheriff announced the discovery of a 11 year old Guatemalan boys body about a mile from the border. Cuellar said the discovery of the boys body reinforces just how perilous the journey is into the US. 

“Certainly I hope they stop coming because we probably will have more deaths as the hot weather continues,” says Cuellar. “It’s not just the heat that could kill them but there are other dangers. Officials at Lackland Air Force Base told us that one-third of young girls that come across – and they were just like little babies; 10, 11, 14 years of age. That about one third of them get raped and/or abused on the way here.” 

Cuellar says that as he was speaking to Customs and Border Patrol agents he was also discovering a disturbing trend of adults “renting” children in Central America in order to increase their chances of being able to stay in the U.S. once they cross over.

In the past, immigration enforcement would encounter about 5,000 unaccompanied minors in a year. That started changing around 2010 when the number began ticking upward dramatically. The numbers of such minors being seen now are unprecedented. The 52,000 who have shown up so far this year are a 99% increase over last year, according to the U.S. Customs & Border Protection official website:

How bad is it? Our immigration system has been totally and completely overwhelmed.

Remember that when Arizona tried to take steps to secure it's own border 2 years ago, the state was quickly slapped down by Washington DC with the full approval of the Progressive Left. 

Progressives never notice until it's too late that real people will risk their lives based on sh*t they said to look cool and win votes.

"Why, I'd never send those people back like that mean ol' George Bush!"

Remember when he was running back in 1991, Bill Clinton criticized then-President George H.W. Bush for his policy of stopping and returning Haitian boats that attempted landfall in Florida? Eager to prove how compassionate and cool he was compared to Bush, Clinton forthrightly declared than when HE was President, he wouldn't send those boats back. He'd welcome them with open arms!

GUESS WHAT HAPPENED NEXT?

Surprising no one except apparently Bill Clinton, there was a huge upsurge in the number of boats and leaky rafts launched from desperate places like Cuba and Haiti that tried to make it to Florida. Some of those boats and leaky makeshift rafts sank, and suddenly a crisis was happening. Sure some people drowned every year trying to make that dangerous trip, but the huge spike in numbers meant a huge spike in deaths.  Then there were reports of almost 1,000 makeshift rafts being prepared by Haitians who intended to launch them in concurrence with Clinton's inauguration.

Clinton was flabbergasted by this. It was stunning to him to realize poor, desperate people would make decisions that would place their lives at risk based on something he said just to look cool on the campaign trail and garner some votes. That thousands of people would risk drowning in the ocean based on some soundbite he threw out there to win a news cycle & look more compassionate than Bush brought Clinton up short and forced him to reexamine his position.

So shortly before his inauguration, Clinton announced that he would be continuing the exact same deportation policy that Bush had. He swallowed his pride and did the right thing. The New York Times reported:

Saying that he feared a mass exodus of Haitians unless he acted, President-elect Bill Clinton announced today that he would at least temporarily abandon a campaign pledge and would continue the Bush Administration's policy of forcibly returning Haitians who try to emigrate to the United States. 

It was Mr. Clinton who helped create the expectation of an exodus from Haiti when he condemned the Bush Administration for a "cruel policy of returning Haitian refugees to a brutal dictatorship without an asylum hearing." 

Mr. Clinton had promised to give Haitians refuge and make it easier for them to apply for political asylum until democracy is restored in their country. At one point in the campaign he said, "If I were President, I would -- in the absence of clear and compelling evidence that they weren't political refugees -- give them temporary asylum until we restored the elected Government of Haiti." 

That promise prompted Haitians to build nearly 1,000 boats that could accommodate as many as 150,000 people, many of whom are poised to set sail in stormy seas in the hopes of arriving on American shores at the moment of Mr. Clinton's inauguration Wednesday.

Now, this made Clinton look bad in the press, of course. After spending all that time attacking Bush for being so mean for not letting all those people in and stuff. But Bill Clinton was enough of a human being with REAL COMPASSION that when he realized his mistake, he fixed it as soon as he could when he saw a humanitarian crisis developing. It never occurred to him to just sit back, let it happen, and then try to score political points and power off of the resulting crisis.

Now contrast Clinton's behavior with that of Obama. This current President has pursued his agenda of not enforcing this country's immigration laws for going on 6 years. There is evidence this past January that the DHS was looking for escorts to care for over 60,000 unaccompanied minors at our borders.

Part of the description for the job reads thusly: 

Transport will be required for either category of [Unaccompanied Minors] or individual juveniles, to include both male and female juveniles. There will be approximately 65,000 UAC in total: 25 percent local ground transport, 25 percent via ICE charter and 50 percent via commercial air. Escort services include, but are not limited to, assisting with: transferring physical custody of UAC [Unaccompanied Alien Children] from DHS to Health and Human Services (HHS) care via ground or air methods of transportation (charter or commercial carrier) 

Let's see a show of hands: How many readers suppose that was just an extremely lucky GUESS on the part of the DHS that the number of unaccompanied minors would surge to 65,000+?

In other words, this administration knew this deluge of kids at the border was coming even before this year started. And yet Obama & Co. want to pretend they are just as SURPRISED as anybody else at what's happened. They never said a thing about it last year. Or this January. Or February. Or March. It just...SNUCK UP on everybody, you see. 

Except it didn't. Obama didn't just cluelessly walk into a humanitarian crisis here like Clinton did back in 1992. This crisis has been building and growing and coming for some time now, just like every other crisis Obama's mismanaged or ignored until dealing with it either was forced upon him or deigning to notice it suited his political purposes.

Thousands of kids are now homeless and held in camps, hundreds of young girls have been raped, and more than handful likely died making the dangerous trip in a humanitarian crisis that Obama deliberately helped create for his own political purposes. The reason for creating this crisis is to force amnesty on the country by overwhelming the borders, collapsing our present immigration system and then proposing amnesty as the 'solution'.

Forget Karl Marx. You need to learn about THESE people

This is textbook Cloward-Piven theory come to life. C-P was a theory developed by two Columbia University professors back in 1966 that deliberately seeks to collapse societal safety nets & welfare structure in order to foment the advancement of socialism. Can't change the system inside it's Constitutional constraints? No problem! Deliberately overwhelm and crash it then. In the chaos that follows you'll have much better luck getting things where you want them to go.

Once again Progressives have to try to TRICK people to get what they want. They simply WILL NOT come out into the open and honestly argue and debate for their real goals. We've seen it with ObamaCare, we've seen it with Global Warming, and now here again with this manufactured border crisis that Obama is going to use to grab more power for himself.